A rocket that is in the border of the universe, has the same velocity as the stars. When the engine is switched on, the rocket moves vaster than the stars. The velocity can become greater than the velocity of light. With respect to an observer on the earth. Light is transported by gravityparticles. From this assumption follows the conclusion that gravityparticles move with the velocity of light. Stars in the border of the universe can’t move faster than the gravityparticles. So the velocity of stars can’t be greater than the velocity of light. If a star, in the border of the universe, emits a lightwave in the direction of the earth, then this wave is transported by gravityparticles. The majority of these gravityparticles moves away from the center of the universe. After 1 second the wave is 186 thousand miles away from the star. However, the wave is less than 186 thousand miles closer to the earth. After a month the wave is surrounded by more gravityparticles that have a different direction. Every month the wave is a certain distance closer to the earth. But this distance is increasing. When the velocity of light is reached by the wave, with respect to the earth, the wave covers every month the same distance. If an observer on the earth multiplies the time the wave was on the way with the velocity of light, he becomes a distance that is greater than the distance from the earth to the star. It means that the stars in the border of the universe seem farther away then they are.
In the early 80’s I have set up the hypothesis. I have developed it farher by adding some assumptions. One assumption is that light is transported by gravityparticles. This assumption does not agree with some experiments. I know that. I have yet published this assumption, because the bending of a lightbeam along a heavy planet can easy be explained with it. An experiment is based on several assumptions. If an assumption is not correct, than the conclusion of the experiment can be not correct. An example. Copernicus believed that the planets rotate in perfect circles around the sun. He also believed that moonrock is attracted only by the moon and not by the earth. Since 1969 we know that this is not true. An experimentator who lays outside on a table a piece of moonrock, would expect that the rock rises up and, after a long journey, falls on the moon. He observes that the rock is still on the table. Then he concludes that the moon no longer exists. Experimental proved. This conclusion is not just, because an assumption, where the experiment is based on, is not just. Fortunately it seldom appears that an assumption is not just. However if an experiment doesn’t fit with an existing theory, one should be careful with the conclusion. It is possible that my assumption that light is transported by gravityparticles is not correct. On the other hand the hypothesis can still be correci. Of course the hypothesis can also be not correct. In that case I have made the greatest, astronomical discovery in history with a wrong hypothesis. Also remarkable.
There is a theory of the static universe. In the first time the universe didn’t expand. The hypothesis excludes that in the universe there where only stars. I presume that the stars are generated by heating up hydrogen with gravityparticles until nuclear fusion began. So, the black holes were earlier than the stars. If there are no gravityparticles the stars will explode. If there are gravityparticles the universe expands.